[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ILUG] Re: [development] anyone awake? libc5 vs libc6

To: ilug@linux.ie
Subject: [ILUG] Re: [development] anyone awake? libc5 vs libc6
From: Lars Hecking <lhecking@nmrc.ucc.ie>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 11:16:27 +0000
In-Reply-To: <199812170010.AAA18488@inle.ie.suberic.net>; from kevin lyda on Thu, Dec 17, 1998 at 12:10:37AM +0000
Mail-Followup-To: ilug@linux.ie
References: <199812170010.AAA18488@inle.ie.suberic.net>
Reply-To: ilug@linux.ie
Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 11:17:00 GMT
Resent-From: ilug@linux.ie
Resent-Message-ID: <"BBTlJB.A.Dx.sgOe2"@dagda>
Resent-Sender: ilug-request@linux.ie

kevin lyda writes:
> 
> is there a pre-processor symbol to look for to see if i'm using libc6
> (glibc2) vs libc5?

 __GLIBC__ >= 2  ?

-- 
                   Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug@linux.ie
    To unsubscribe, mail ilug-request@linux.ie with Subject: unsubscribe
WWW: http://www.linux.ie/                List maintainer: listmaster@linux.ie

References:
- [ILUG] [development] anyone awake? libc5 vs libc6
  - From: kevin lyda <kevin@suberic.net>

Prev by Date: [ILUG] [advocacy][applications] wp on download.com *info*
Next by Date: [ILUG] Re: checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no
Prev by thread: [ILUG] [development] anyone awake? libc5 vs libc6
Next by thread: [ILUG] Re: [Slightly off topic~ish] - The Hardware Book
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread