Niall O Broin wrote:
because you most likely don't have enough
> RAM to buffer all that I/O - if you do, why bitch about Netscape's miserable 48M ?
I'm running a dual PII350 with 256MB ram. When I come in here and
download my mail (regularily 100+ tiny ilug emails) for each and every
single one of them I get a disk grunt and a mouse lock-up.
And of course there's ways to bypass the normal disk I/O - AFAIK
syslogd does it for every line of certain logs....
Netscape is now up to 51202k and will continue to grow....I heard that
It has some very bad memory leaks.....
> As to why you've got so little space for buffering, Netscape's miserable 48M might
> have something to do with that.
I don't consider 48M a 'miserable' amount of memory - for what it
(Netscape) does - when you consider that you can run a whole operating
system from a few floppies (with a full implementation of the networking
stack) netscape's 50 plus (and growing) Mb points to bad code.
> Kindest regards,
You can do this in a number of ways. IBM chose to do all of them.
Why do you find that funny?
-- D. Taylor, Computer Science 350
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!