Paul Jakma said:
> I think its a worthwhile idea alright, and it just might work.
> One small catch would be that every tom dick and harry toolkit
> would want in on the act :-). One could compare gtk in the server
> vs no gtk as a CISC vs RISC style argument.
>> Well RISC is clearly superior! (oops wrong thread.). It's not about
> 'gtk in the server'. It'd be far more generic than that. It'd be a
> way for any client to store a set of rendering procedures in the
> server along with info on how to do basic modifications, (eg
> length/width/colour), and refer back to it later.
>> The biggest benefit would obviously be when using a standard
> programming widget library across all your apps.
IMHO, I can see other problems as well; there'd be version compatibility
issues too, e.g. gtk-1.1.x versus gtk-1.2.x, etc. Also, it could bloat
the server's memory use even more than it already is. I think there's
already enough version incompatibilty with all this GTK shared lib crap,
so basically I think I like D11 more ;)
PS: thx to the people who replied about AO/DI -- and Padraig Brady, it
does sound like Ieunet's (now esat.net's) callback situation is the
nearest thing Irish ISPs can do. For god's sake where's that bloody DSL
TE were talking about!!! ;)
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!