This is a real problem on networks which have older unices which haven't
been
kept secure on them . It can become ridiculous in some cases as a hack
can be achieved in a matter of seconds. I find it worrying , not
surprising though,
that the hacks are so well documented and so easy to perform but that
many admins , particular those used to windows related networks, seem to
be
unprepared for them.
...shane
Smelly Pooh wrote:
>> In reply to Justin Mason's flatulent wordings,
> >
> > Also Linux and other UNIXes have a well-designed, secure, multi-user
> > basis, where system binaries are owned by root and normal people do all
> > (or almost all) their work as a non-root user.
>> The advantage there is that unix implements some kind of multi-user protection
> whereas win 95 and MacOS do not. That is not to say that it's well-designed
> at all, it's very inflexible, all you need for unlimited access is to hack
> root, and root isn't too hard to hack on most unix machines.
--
##########sdempsey at iol.iesdempsey at emhain.wit.ie########
#######...shane D http://www.iol.ie/~sdempsey##########
When love is gone, there's always justice.
And when justice is gone, there's always force.
And when force is gone, there's always Mom.
Hi, Mom! -- Laurie Anderson
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!