> On Wed, Apr 12, 2000 at 05:07:17PM +0100, John P. Looney wrote:
> > It should be pointed out, that this is technically illegal (they are
> > changing the words of the person sending the mail, adding to
transmission
> > and storage costs, not to mention making it look immensely
> > unprofessional), and on the qmail mailing list a while back, someone
> > posted a patch to bounce all such mails, as well as mails with massive
> > sigs.
>> They also lower the standard of people's lives (more garbage on the
bandwidth,
> more pointless shite to ignore in an email...). Has any institution ever
> actually gotten in trouble for something an employee has sent? I guess an
> un-trustable employee might be able to cause some trouble - Guess what -
An
> untrustable employee in your business can cause a lot more problems a lot
> quicker.
>> You don't see companies who actually know how to use technology adding
these
> shitty disclaimers onto the end of their emails, i.e. technology
companies.
>
Legally the officers of the company are accountable for any actions taken by
employees of the company using company resources (e.g. email).
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
