LINUX.IE, website of the Irish Linux Users' Group
Tux rules!

   
Home
New Users
Articles
Download
Projects
Community
Vendors

  Print Version
Email to...
 
Archives:


planetILUG

Recent News

News Archive


Join the
ILUG
on FaceBook


Join the
ILUG
on LinkedIn


Join the
ILUG SETI
Group



















 
 :: Mailing Lists

Registries was (Re: [ILUG] Some more Questions : )

Registries was (Re: [ILUG] Some more Questions : )

John P. Looney jplooney-ilug at online.ie
Wed Feb 2 12:46:18 GMT 2000


On Wed, Feb 02, 2000 at 05:45:51AM -0600, John_White at dell.com mentioned:
> <snip>
> > Why do you need to do this, out of interest?
> yeah, . . . why? 
> 
> When trying to apply Windows concepts to UNIX which will just make it
> frustrating for yourself, embrace it's difference, treat it like a new
> fruit, don't constrain it within the bounds of something familliar - you
> lose something of it's richness. 
> ("You must unlearn what you have learnt" - Master Yoda)

 The idea of a registry is good. A single API for all apps to store their
stuff in. The Microsoft implementation wasn't too bad. It has it's
problems, but overall, it's functional.

 It's the stupid programmers that abuse a registry that affect system
performance and stability. The outlook people thought it would be cunning
to store the calendar & mail addresses in it. The driver people thought it
would be cunning to store device settings in it. 

 Gnome people thought it would be cunning to store data in a registry.
Gnome-Pilot stores stuff like the addressbook details in it - as in, "The
addressbook file is in xxxx". Big difference.

> Hey why don't we keep the entire sytsem configuration in a centralised
> database that's loaded in memory all the time ? . . .
> That way, it'll use up memory, and give the user nothing in return. Also,
> the more software someone installs, the more memory it will take up, and the
> slower their system will run ! ! ! !

 Do remember that it's swapped out when not in use...

> And when someone wants to copy an application from one system to
> another, they'll have to search all sorts of places in the registry to
> find other bits & components of the app.

 You can export branches of a registry out, just like you can tar up the
filesystem. It's just not easy to do :)

 If it was a common requirement, in an ideal world, applications would
have a "purge registry entries" menu thing, and a "export registry
settings" menu thing. They don't. With GNOME's registry, you can do "cp
-rd ~/.gnome/appname ~otheraccount/.gnome/appname - something I'd to do
yesterday, when copying settings from my home account to this one.

 If anyone is doing anything, and thinks "I'd like a registry", checkout
out ACAP. It's supposed to be a "network registry". That would rock. If
all the linux apps you know any love become registry aware...esp. Vim, so
I could edit the registry with a text editor :)

Kate

-- 
Do you have a problem with American Mulitnationals forcing the arrest of a 
Norwegian 16 year old, because he made them look like fools by cracking
DVD encryption, so he could play his own DVDs, and then sharing his DVD
player ? Sign the petition: http://linuxguiden.linpro.no/protesteng.php




More information about the ILUG mailing list
Read this without the formatting.
                                                                                                    

 

Hosted by HEAnet


Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds, used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance of this highly praised website. Looking for the Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
RSS Version
Powered by Dell