> Sure! -- use slocal. .forward has:
>> "| /usr/lib/nmh/slocal -user jm || exit 75"
Hmm that's really cool. Stupid question: can I invoke that from
Procmail, after having invoked another program which may have
edited the message?
Background: I like MAPS RBL,DUL,RSS, but I don't like blackholing.
So sendmail uses procmail as a delivery agent, and /etc/procmailrc
contains
:0 f
| rblchk X-Antispam 10
...which is a perl program will add an X-Antispam header, then
deliver the message to /var/spool/mail/username or wherever
~/.procmailrc instructs it to. Is there a right way to invokej
rblchk from slocal, or slocal from procmail in such a way that
procmail won't try to re-deliver the message after slocal has
done the job?
Cheers,
Dave
--
dave.wilson at heanet.ie --------------------------------------- +353-1-662-3412
It is one thing to pray; it is another to pray to entities who might not only
be listening, but who will search you out on the road and beat you across the
head with sticks if you say something that offends them. -- Neil Gaiman
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
