Thomas Bridge wrote:
> An obvious example is running a nameserver.
Agreed, but perhaps surprisingly, this is exactly the application where you
absolutely have to have VM overcommit. Otherwise, you are unable to fork
named efficiently.
I don't know what sort of vm footprint Clubi's nameserver has, but IOL's is
regularly in the region of 70 or 80Mb. Imagine forking 10 copies of this
(for named-xfer) where each child was guaranteed full r/w use of the memory
they inherited from their parent? Ugh.
Nick
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!