On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 05:55:55PM +0000, John P. Looney wrote:
>> I don't agree with that. As long as you tell people "this will change.
> Write for this chip natively, and it'll not work on Crusoe chips released
> in four months", people won't write for it.
>History shows that this is not correct. Both Apple and Microsoft have been
plagued down throught the years by the need to maintain backwards
compatibility with applications which used un-documented but well-known
interfaces to their OS. It was a smaller problem for Apple as they have much
better defined API and programming guidelines, but it was a big issue for
MS. Every version of MS-DOS needed to maintain backwards compatibility with
little tricks used by application programmers - nobody would upgrade their
OS if Lotus 1-2-3 suddenly wouldn't work, and they didn't much care if MS
said "Well, it's Lotus' fault"). 'doze users are still paying the price for
this today. If Transmeta released the specs to program to their metal, they
expose themselves to the danger that somebody will code a really hot app. to
that because it gives them an edge, and then Transmeta are stuck between a
rock and a hard place.
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!