You should see some of the posts about this in the archives, both on
this list and on the CLUG list, hot topic when it gets going!
I'm in favour of the current method of replying (reply to sender, not
list) but there are valid reasons for having the reply set to "reply to
list" as well, although I believe it breaks RFCs or something..
Pigs will fly :)
Donncha.
"McDaid, Aaron" wrote:
>> I find it somewhat confusing when one
> doesn't know whether or not a reply
> to an ILUG post should be "reply-to-all"
> or just send the mail to ilug at linux.ie>> The latter would cause anyone not on the
> list to miss out (obviously!). This could
> happen if the original poster was not on
> the list (unlikely I suppose) or maybe
> if someone on-list sent the mail to a friend
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!