LINUX.IE, website of the Irish Linux Users' Group
Tux rules!

   
Home
New Users
Articles
Download
Projects
Community
Vendors

  Print Version
 
Archives:


planetILUG

Recent News

News Archive


Join the
ILUG
on FaceBook


Join the
ILUG
on LinkedIn


Join the
ILUG SETI
Group



















 
 :: Mailing Lists

[ILUG] gcc optimisation weirdness?

[ILUG] gcc optimisation weirdness?

Brady, Padraig Padraig.Brady at compaq.com
Wed May 10 18:13:08 IST 2000


Few points.

1. Shouldn't it be: int frequency[10];
2. Try to get assembler output for the various optimisation options and diff
them.
3. C compilers can init arrays @ 3 different times.
	1. Compile time. Use static arrays of appropriate. All values are
set to 0
	2. Program startup code, sets module level initialised arrays. I.E.
int arr[]={1,2};
	3. Runtime code generated by compiler inits local initialised arrays
(using
         the same construct as in 2).

p.s. a handy macro when working with arrays is
#define ARRAY_SIZE(array) (sizeof(array)/sizeof(array[0]))
This will be worked out by the compiler at compile time.
So this tidys things a lot when you don't have to explicitly
specify (configure) the number of elements (99% of time).
e.g.

int arr[]={1,2,3,4,5};
int arr_idx=0;
for(;arr_idx<ARRAY_SIZE(arr);arr_idx++) printf("%d,",arr[arr_idx]);

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Jakma [mailto:paulj at itg.ie]
> Sent: 10 May 2000 17:39
> To: ilug at linux.ie
> Subject: [ILUG] gcc optimisation weirdness?
> 
> 
> gcc seems to do weird things to the following:
> 
> int input, frequency[9];
> 
> //frequency[] initialised to 0.
> 
> do {
>                 scanf("%d", &input);
>                 if (input > 0 && input < 11) {
> 			//point 1
>                         (frequency[input-1])++;
> 			//point 2
>                         }
>         } while (input);
> 
> if i compile with -O2 or -O3 it works as i expect it to, but 
> if i compile
> with "gcc -o test test.c" then:
> 
> it works correctly for digits 0 thru 9, however if i enter 10 it goes
> wrong: at point 1 input == 10, at point 2 input == 11! 
> 
> seems like gcc is applying the increment to variable input,
> despite my bracketing of frequency[input-1]! which i don't
> want. why???
> 
> (even without the brackets it should not increment input)
> 
> --paulj.
> 
> PS: is there anyway to initialise an array at declaration time, rather
> than iterate thru the array and set each element manually? eg 
> something
> like: int array[9]=0; 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug at linux.ie
> http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for 
> (un)subscription information.
> List maintainer: listmaster at linux.ie
> 




More information about the ILUG mailing list
Read this without the formatting.
                                                                                                    

 

Hosted by HEAnet


Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds, used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance of this highly praised website. Looking for the Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
RSS Version
Powered by Dell