[ILUG] dot.what..[ot]

[Noel Carroll]

Why argue?   Why not just get some alphas together and do some rendering.
Some people on the list I know have Alphas.   Might be a good sideshow for
the AGM.

Noel

> -----Original Message-----
> From: singer at redbrick.dcu.ie [mailto:singer at redbrick.dcu.ie]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 6:38 PM
> To: ilug at linux.ie
> Subject: Re: [ILUG] dot.what..[ot]
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 06:21:04PM +0100, David Murphy wrote:
> > 
> > I would certainly carry out my own detailed investigations of any
> > product before committing to it, if the time to do so were 
> available.
> > I hope everyone else making important decisions based on 
> usenet posts
> > or linux journal articles does too.
> 
> The post that Rev. Don Kool made to comp.unix.admin certainly 
> wasn't rebuked
> with a load of "Duh, you're wrong, here's the url to explain 
> what really
> happened.." replies. Incidentally, the good Rev. is a well 
> known anti-pseudo
> UNIX chap, who loaths Sun too - I wasn't posting that URL as 
> a "proof" of what
> really happened, it was a usenet post for crying out loud - I 
> was however
> intrested in finding out in what actually happened, since 
> I've heard two
> wildly opposing views on how shite/non-shite Linux was on 
> those Alphas...
> 
> Brian.
> -- 
> How can I, that girl standing there,   |
> My attention fix                       |
> On Roman or on Russian      W.B.       |
> Or on Spanish politics...   Yeats 1939 |
> 
> -- 
> Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug at linux.ie
> http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for 
> (un)subscription information.
> List maintainer: listmaster at linux.ie
>