On Mon, May 29, 2000 at 08:47:26AM +0100, Vincent Cunniffe wrote:
> Conor Daly wrote:
> >
> > Now, the only difference in the last post was that I used a valid email
> > address rather than a spoofed one and specified the text only editor rather
> > than the HTML editor. I wonder which made the difference?
>> The HTML content doesn't make any different (apart from annoying people
> who don't have a HTML-aware mail reader (and lots who do ;-))
Don't forget mailman can be set to refuse mails with attachments (I think),
or mails over a certain size.. maybe the HTML put it over the limit.
I know mails with binary attachments have been blocked before..
Then again, I think the .NOSPAM.net might have been your problem,
I don't think .NOSPAM.net exists..
(And don't test with html mail, please.. :))
L.
--
Liam Bedford | Obscure, la force est noire
System Administrator | Comme le chateau où flotte l'etendard,
WBT Systems, Block 2, | notre drapeau Sois sûr, que sous les
Harcourt Centre, Harcourt St. | feux, la verite est masquee
01-4170100 | Viens, bascule de notre côte, obscur
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
