[ILUG] Gibberish mail [was: [ILUG]¾«²Ê�øÕ¾£¬ÖµµÃÒ»¿´£¡]

[Ruairi Newman]

> 
> Could we possibly consider mails to the list that are full of ascii >
> 128 gibberish to be questionable and hold them for manual verification?
> 

Gibberish?  It depends on the character-set.  You'd probably end up
excluding anything that wasn't in a list of specified character-sets.  
And even then some people would still get gibberish because their MUA
limits them to one or two char sets.

This particular mail is readable in the "Unicode (UTF-8)" char set in
Netscape Communicator.

Rgds,


-- 
Ruairi Newman
http://tech-mad.org/

"Anyone can build a fast CPU.  The trick is to build a fast system." -
Seymour Cray