Paul Jakma said:
> Even worse the KDE crowd took other people's GPL code and incorporated
> it without permission into a non-GPL work!
As an author of free software, this would *piss me off*. That's why I use
It's all very nice mixing and matching, but I for one use the GPL for a
reason. I don't want my code winding up in someone else's product that may
or may not be free at some stage down the line -- I want it to stay free.
Does anyone have more details of what exactly was copied? RMS says:
In addition, in some cases code was copied into KDE from existing
GPL-covered modules whose copyright holders had not given special
permission. (Only the copyright holders can give extra permission to do
things that the GPL does not permit.) That is a real violation of the
GPL. Because of this, and the overall lack of an explicit exception,
the legal status of KDE remained clouded.
And the KDE response says:
There are only two parts of KDE that have GPLed code not written
explicitely for KDE -- a small bit in kmidi and a few lines in
I wonder how many lines exactly? And were they "deep magic" lines or
"i++; return i;" ;) ??
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!