Gotta agree with Kate here. AOLserver is much faster than Apache 1.3.xx,
might be more even when Apache 2.0 becomes more stable.
I would be using AOLserver now except that it didn't work well with PHP
when I tested it last. AOLserver 3.1 is out now so I'll give that a spin
with PHP4. Expect a report later..
Donncha.
"John P . Looney" wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 06:40:37PM +0100, Dave Burke mentioned:
[snip]
> > Example: Apache-1.3.12, with kernel 2.2.16, downloading a 5k file gave an
> > overall requests/sec of 690.62. The best I've gotten out of aolserver,
> > with kernels 2.2.14-5.0 & 2.4.0-test8, is 49.98, and even at that it only
> > completed 29991 out of the 50000 it was supposed to do, before hitting the
> > max time I set.
>> I honestly don't know what you are doing wrong...in my tests, with simple
> "hello world" type script things, I was getting ~10 times the performance
> of Apache on a 128Mb machine. What sort of "concurrent connections" are
> you using ? Anything more than 300 is asking for trouble...though I've not
> ever seen it dropping connections.
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
