LINUX.IE, website of the Irish Linux Users' Group
Tux rules!

   
Home
New Users
Articles
Download
Projects
Community
Vendors

  Print Version
Email to...
 
Archives:


planetILUG

Recent News

News Archive


Join the
ILUG
on FaceBook


Join the
ILUG
on LinkedIn


Join the
ILUG SETI
Group



















 
 :: Mailing Lists

[ILUG] SDMI initiative

[ILUG] SDMI initiative

fergal daly fergal at esatclear.ie
Thu Sep 28 10:59:59 IST 2000


One factor that may make a difference is that you probably won't know
the quality of the initial SDMI compression. What happens if you use
different qualities at each generation?

Colm Buckley wrote:
> 
> Niall O Broin writes:
> 
> > However, JPEG uses a similar kind of compression (psycho-visual
> > model ?), discarding information that the eye doesn't take much
> > account of, but you will surely see the effects of repeated
> > compression/decompression with JPEG.
> 
> No, you don't!
> 
> Look:
> 
> ogma$ ls -l gen0.jpg
> -rw-r--r--    1 colm     users      581874 Sep 28 08:20 gen0.jpg
> ogma$ for a in $(seq 0 9)
> do
>     cjpeg -quality 80 -optimize < picture.ppm > gen$a.jpg
>     djpeg < gen$a.jpg > picture.ppm
> done
> ogma$ ls -l gen*
> -rw-r--r--    1 colm     users      188828 Sep 28 08:30 gen0.jpg
> -rw-r--r--    1 colm     users      188881 Sep 28 08:30 gen1.jpg
> -rw-r--r--    1 colm     users      188877 Sep 28 08:30 gen2.jpg
> -rw-r--r--    1 colm     users      188877 Sep 28 08:30 gen3.jpg
> -rw-r--r--    1 colm     users      188877 Sep 28 08:30 gen4.jpg
> -rw-r--r--    1 colm     users      188877 Sep 28 08:30 gen5.jpg
> -rw-r--r--    1 colm     users      188877 Sep 28 08:30 gen6.jpg
> -rw-r--r--    1 colm     users      188877 Sep 28 08:30 gen7.jpg
> -rw-r--r--    1 colm     users      188877 Sep 28 08:30 gen8.jpg
> -rw-r--r--    1 colm     users      188877 Sep 28 08:30 gen9.jpg
> ogma$ cmp gen2.jpg gen9.jpg
> ogma$
> 
> So, there is what looks like a tiny amount of lossage with the first
> two generations, and after that the file remains identical through
> multiple compression/decompression cycles.  I believe the JFIF encoder
> is pretty standard these days, but if there were different JPEG
> encoders being used at each generation, you might get more loss for
> more generations, but eventually the file would either stabilise and
> be unchanged by a given decompression/compression cycle, or enter a
> set of stable states and alternate between them.  Pretty much the same
> goes for PAM-based audio compression, using ATRAC or MP3 or whatever.




More information about the ILUG mailing list
Read this without the formatting.
                                                                                                    

 

Hosted by HEAnet


Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds, used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance of this highly praised website. Looking for the Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
RSS Version
Powered by Dell