On Wed, Apr 25, 2001 at 05:38:13PM +0100, Kenn Humborg wrote:
> > > The big problem is probably the fact that you're using NFS. Try plain
> > > TCP, such as "rsh" if possible, to make it a bit more efficient.
> Next I'll try out mbuffer...
you might also try out uping the nfs buffer size: it defaults to 1k,
8k might be quicker.
since nfs allows for caching, uses larger buffers and uses udp, i'm a
bit lost on the "extra overhead" argument. not sure who mentioned it,
but i'm curious as to a justification for the comment.
kevin
--
kevin at suberic.net CERT CA-96.13/NiftyGreenShield: ... Impact:
fork()'ed on 37058400 Non-privileged primitive users can cause the
meatspace place: work total destruction of your entire invasion fleet
http://suberic.net/~kevin and gain unauthorized access to files. ...
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
