LINUX.IE, website of the Irish Linux Users' Group
Tux rules!

   
Home
New Users
Articles
Download
Projects
Community
Vendors

  Print Version
Email to...
 
Archives:


planetILUG

Recent News

News Archive


Join the
ILUG
on FaceBook


Join the
ILUG
on LinkedIn


Join the
ILUG SETI
Group



















 
 :: Mailing Lists

[ILUG] 1984 [Fwd: Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act]

[ILUG] 1984 [Fwd: Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act]

anton.mckee at broadcom.ie anton.mckee at broadcom.ie
Fri Apr 27 10:14:20 IST 2001


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The judiciary in the UK will try to interpret the RIP act as much as
they possibly can in line with the European convention on Human Rights
or in actually fact its the Human Rights Act 1998 (UK Bill).

However if the courts cannot interpret the act in compliance with the
Human Rights Act 1998, the RIP still stands and must be enforced. The
courts cannot refuse to implement an Act of Parliament as in the UK
parliament is supreme. However what they can is issue a declaration of
incompatibility. Basically say the RIP act is not in compliance with
the HR Act 1998. 

This may (or may not) have the effect of forcing parliament to redraft
the act. However until such time as the do the RIP act still stands
and you can be convicted under it. It will then fall down to the
courts to decided what measures to take. It would be more than
probable that either the courts will overturn convictions on appeal
taking into consideration the HR Act issues raised during the trial or
may give minimum sentences in order to force parliament to take
action. 

It is very important that everyone know that if there is a conflict
between a statute and the Human rights act, the courts can only issue
a declaration of incompatibility. The conflicting statue is still
enforceable!

Aj

- -----Original Message-----
From: ilug-admin at linux.ie [mailto:ilug-admin at linux.ie]On Behalf Of
Wesley Darlington
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 9:50 AM
To: ilug at linux.ie
Subject: Re: [ILUG] 1984 [Fwd: Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act]



On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:34:08PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
> hmmm... thing is that it is not at all clear how the UK's RIP act
and
> the EU Convention on Human Rights can be reconciled. If they can't
be,
> then the EU CHR takes precedence.

Why?

ATB,
Wesley.

- -- 
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug at linux.ie
http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription
information.
List maintainer: listmaster at linux.ie


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.0.2
Comment: http://www.broadcom.ie/keys/anton.asc

iQA/AwUBOuk6q6egaZmsM7IDEQJp3ACg4JNkNMHfe5dxVKtncycCTGISQegAoJU0
duiSHAmei5TGXkBfJ5Dlb0B9
=sDq6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the ILUG mailing list
Read this without the formatting.
                                                                                                    

 

Hosted by HEAnet


Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds, used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance of this highly praised website. Looking for the Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
RSS Version
Powered by Dell