On Fri, 9 Feb 2001 tor_bendiksen at ie.ibm.com wrote:
> Has anyone any experience with LVM-0.9.1-beta3 and 2.4.1? I don't want to
> start downgrading to 2.4 if anyone has any heads-ups or any other tips..
beta3 still has problems. best thing to do is wait for that. Until
then (assuming 0.9.1beta4 works) back out the LVM0.8final -> v0.9
section from the 2.4.0-prerelease patch, and the 0.9 -> 0.9.1beta1
section of the 2.4.1 patch.
(or hang on cause i've done the 2.4.0pre bit already, and i have to
the other bits this weekend to test an NFS patch. I can send you the
diff to revert 2.4.2preX to 0.8final)
alternatively try your luck with LVM from CVS (www.sistina.com).
as you might gather 0.8final is pretty stable, apart from one or 2
rough issues.
>> Regards,
> Tor
--paulj
- LVM fan, but not impressed with how the LVM guys release their
software. (they don't).
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
