[ILUG] ISDN question

[Dave Airlie]

sounds like you missing an alias in /etc/modules.conf for ippp1 ...
maybe.. not sure .. the module thing is wierd..

Dave.


On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, John P. Looney wrote:

>  During big downloads, I'm getting the following in my logs;
>
> Jul 20 22:57:55 localhost ibod[790]: added new link
> Jul 20 22:57:55 localhost kernel: ippp1: dialing 1 8192401...
> Jul 20 22:57:57 localhost kernel: isdn_net: ippp1 connected
> Jul 20 22:57:57 localhost ipppd[783]: Local number: +35316212385, Remote
> number: 8192401, Type: outgoing
> Jul 20 22:57:57 localhost ipppd[783]: PHASE_WAIT -> PHASE_ESTABLISHED,
> ifunit: 1, linkunit: 1, fd: 8
> Jul 20 22:57:57 localhost modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module ippp1
> Jul 20 22:57:57 localhost ipppd[783]: ioctl(SIOCSIFMTU): No such device, 6
> ippp1 1524.
> Jul 20 22:57:57 localhost ipppd[783]: MPPP negotiation, He: No We: No
> Jul 20 22:57:57 localhost ipppd[783]: local  IP address 159.134.230.176
> Jul 20 22:57:57 localhost ipppd[783]: remote IP address 159.134.238.215
> Jul 20 22:57:57 localhost modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module ippp1
> Jul 20 22:57:57 localhost ipppd[783]: ioctl(SIOCAIFADDR): No such device
> Jul 20 22:57:57 localhost ipppd[783]: LCP terminated by peer
> Jul 20 22:57:57 localhost modprobe: modprobe: Can't locate module ippp1
> Jul 20 22:57:57 localhost ipppd[783]: ioctl(SIOCSIFMTU): No such device, 6
> ippp1 1500.
> Jul 20 22:57:59 localhost kernel: ippp1: remote hangup
> Jul 20 22:57:59 localhost kernel: ippp1: Chargesum is 0
> Jul 20 22:57:59 localhost ipppd[783]: Modem hangup
> Jul 20 22:57:59 localhost ipppd[783]: Connection terminated.
> Jul 20 22:57:59 localhost ipppd[783]: taking down PHASE_DEAD link 1,
> linkunit: 1
> Jul 20 22:57:59 localhost ipppd[783]: closing fd 8 from unit 1
> Jul 20 22:57:59 localhost ipppd[783]: link 1 closed , linkunit: 1
> Jul 20 22:57:59 localhost ipppd[783]: reinit_unit: 1
> Jul 20 22:57:59 localhost ipppd[783]: Connect[1]: /dev/ippp1, fd: 8
>
>  It seems like it's trying to bring up the second channel. Which is good.
> Anyone know why it's failing, and if I can actually do it ? (I'm using
> Eircom Free, which apparently supports dual channel).
>
> Kate
>
>

-- 
David Airlie, Software Engineer
http://www.skynet.ie/~airlied / airlied at skynet.ie
pam_smb / Linux DecStation / Linux VAX / ILUG person