Personally I would go with reiserFS, its basically a journaling file system,
such as jfs or loath I say it, NTFS, or whatever, the nice thing about it
is, fsck is gone! If you are lazy and do a reboot without downing the
volumes correctly then it doesn't care, it still boots in the same time.
Nice for people with 30GiG volumes. But kinda critical in an enterprise
server.
CW
Thats all I know and it ain't much, and I may be wrong :)
-----Original Message-----
From: Stefan [mailto:fstab at aon.at]
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 7:53 PM
To: ilug at linux.ie
Subject: [ILUG] Reiser-fs
Can someone explain me the differences between a reiser-fs and a extf2? Or
where i
can find informations about it?
And is it better to use a reiser-fs or a extf2 in a server system?
Regards,
stk
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
