On Wed, Nov 07, 2001 at 05:10:15PM +0000, Paul Jakma mentioned:
> globally unique addrs, eg with IPv6:
> - disadvantages none
> - advantages over 'global unique addresses' none
> - disadvantages some
- gives people the impression they don't need a firewall
> > Can't argue with that, but what percentage of people out there can
> > live perfectly happily with NAT?
> so when everyone is using IPv6, they should still use NAT?
It can be useful when you have applications that don't know how to talk
to different members in a load balanced service. Imagine how simple load
balancing would be, if you had ten webservers in a load balanced set, each
with a unique ip, all round robin DNS'd to the same hostname.
If programmers would just get a list of all IPs associated with a
hostname, try the first, attempt to connect, and if that failed inside of
a second or three, try the second etc. - everything would be rosy. But no.
People are lazy. So, you have to do NAT etc. to get around it. It's a
John Looney Chief Scientist
a n t e f a c t o t: +353 1 8586004
www.antefacto.com f: +353 1 8586014
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!