On Wed, 07-Nov-2001 at 18:25:18 +0000, Paul Jakma wrote:
>http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2052.html
Actually, that's been superceded by RFC 2782.
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2782.html
> service - well known service name
> protocol - tcp or udp (but some ferkin idiots thought it'd be clever
> to use _tcp and _udp -> active directory and more.. same for service,
> eg "_http". arg....)
Take a look at the new RFC I mentioned. It does, unfortunately, specify
that the underscore is now required.
> all above is done client side. and clients that dont support SRV will
> obviously not make use of it.
Sadly, not many clients do support it.
http://dns.vanrein.org/srv/tools/
There is talk about adding it to Mozilla, but it seems to be primarily talk
at the moment. Dealing with the failover issues when you're talking about
an ephemeral protocol like HTTP isn't as easy as it sounds.
But it really would be nice if this would happen. With SRV records, I'd
finally accept the idea of <http://wunsch.org/> being a reasonable sort of
URL.
--
Take care,
Scott \\'unsch
... Psychic Error: You know what key to press...
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
