On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 02:50:48PM +0100, Liam Bedford wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 09:41:35AM -0400, Wesley Darlington came forth with:
> > On Wed, Oct 03, 2001 at 02:29:26PM +0100, Paul Jakma wrote:
> > > ah.. with apt-get install i see it's cause it's cause there the new
> > > package is dependent on packages i dont have installed.
> > Odd. The dependencies should resolve Just Fine.
> nope.. from the man page:
> Packages currently installed with new versions available are retrieved and
> upgraded; under no circum stances are currently installed packages
> removed, or packages not already installed retrieved and installed. New
> versions of currently installed packages that cannot be upgraded without
> changing the install status of another package will be left at their
> current version.
Yes. For an "upgrade". I was talking about "install". Although I could
have made this clearer...
Wesley.
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
