According to cybersean3000 at yahoo.com:
> Keep these things in mind:
>> * Microsoft has over 90% of the desktop market, yet the American
> government has difficulty declaring it a monopoly. IBM and Standard Oil
> were declared monopolies and broken up with a much lower percentage of
> market share.
This gets a bit tiring after seeing it so many times.
You do not automatically fall foul of monopoly law by holding the greatest
(or in fact, the only) market share. The so-called monopoly laws are
concerned with how you behave once you /are/ the majority `shareholder' of
a given market. It is a simple matter of arithmetic to prove that a company
holds the biggest share of a market; it is far more difficult to prove that
they are abusing that position, no matter how obvious it is to `everyone'.
The EU have been equally as slow to do anything about Microsoft, as have any
other given nation you care to choose. I guess they're all part of the
The law is designed to protect as well as prosecute. If the law were instead
designed to simply declare a holder of > 50% market share to be a monopoly
and thus a target for litigation, you would be disposing of the principle
of innocent until proven guilty.
It's the price of a fair system - some good guys get caught out, and some
bad guys get away.
Waider. I'm not, of course, suggesting the system is even remotely fair.
waider at dspsrv.com / Chances are I'm not at home right now.
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!