Ha, Ha, the files are an example. To prevent the suggestion that not
everything was copied.
From: Niall O Broin [mailto:niall at linux.ie]
Sent: 05 December 2002 14:16
To: ilug at linux.ie
Subject: Re: [ILUG] NTFS is better than ext3?
On Thursday 05 December 2002 14:13, Satelle, StevenX wrote:
> The header says it all really. I synced to directories from an ext3
> partition to a win32 NTFS partition using samba. The directory size on
> Linux is 3.6G and on windows the same directory is 3.4G and I'm fairly
> that everything was copied. Looking at another file I see the same thing.
> On linux:
> du -sh /home/apt-tar.gz
> 4.0k /home/apt-tar.gz
>> On Windows:
> du -sh /mnt/lapt/sys/upload/home/apt-tar.gz
> 2.0k /mnt/lapt/sys/upload/home/apt-tar.gz
Wow - Linux gets great compression - 3.6G down to 4.0k - but go Windows -
down to 2.0k.
Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug at linux.iehttp://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
List maintainer: listmaster at linux.ie
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!