[ILUG] NTFS is better than ext3?

[kevin lyda]

On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:51:30PM +0000, Nick Murtagh wrote:
> kevin lyda wrote:
> > uh, i do.  i just ran it on my /boot partition:
> >     /boot
> >     vmlinuz-2.4.18-17.7.x
> >     System.map-2.4.18-17.7.x
> >     module-info-2.4.18-17.7.x
> Well I get stuff like this:
> "%(+.147:=@CFILORUX[^adgjmpsvy|
> !$'*-0369<?BEHKNQTWZ]`cfilorux{~
>   #&),/258;>ADGJMPSVY\_behknqtwz}

yes, you'll get some of that too.  but if you have a dead fs, you'll
get *some* meaningful stuff that might help you locate/retrieve critical
stuff.

On Thu, Dec 05, 2002 at 04:44:17PM -0000, Brian O'Donoghue wrote:
> > then you seem to agree with niall and liam on one level.  liam stated
> > his experience and the response was "liar, fud, blah."
> Bah, I'm just saying out of roughly six times using ReiserFS, it hasn't
> crashed on me.

oh, then i'm sorry.  in american "liar and fud" mean that a person is
being maliciously untruthful.  i didn't realise that the english meaning
was, "my limited experience does not agree with yours."  you'll have to
forgive me, i'm still learning english...

many pardons,

kevin

-- 
kevin at ie.suberic.net          dante hicks: but you hate people.
fork()'ed on 37058400         randal graves: yes, but i love gatherings.
meatspace place: home                        isn't it ironic?
http://ie.suberic.net/~kevin       --clerks