Quoting Ronan Waide <waider at waider.ie>:
> On December 19, ronan at cunniffe.net said:
> > Hi all,
> > Is this -O option to mount a red-hattism? I build util-linux (11n) and
> the
>> Hmm, I can see it as an option to umount, but not to mount. Can you
> maybe quote some context?
I don't have a Redhat install to hand here. It's in /etc/rc.sysinit, the line
that mounts local filesystems. mount -a -O <class> mounts everything in
/etc/fstab, only it now "omits" any fs explicitly flagged as belonging to
<class>. I think the line was
mount -a blah blah -O netdevfs
Except that there's no use of this flag in /etc/fstab. Hence my slight
wondering if it was a RedHattism.
Thanks all,
Ronan
> Waider.
> --
>waider at waider.ie / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
>> merde says, "i liked [the company] a lot, but i fear the relentless hip of
> the
> environment may cause me to become caustic and irritable."
>
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!