On Sun, Dec 29, 2002 at 02:52:48PM -0800, Rick Moen wrote:
> The statement is overly broad: Limits on allegedly-proprietary
> knowledge are regulated by state law, and treatment differs by state.
> California law, for example, makes covenants not to compete 100%
> unenforceable[1], and also renders proprietary-inventions agreements
but companies over there still put them in. the one time i had to sign an
nda type agreement (oddly not *at* nda which is a company i worked at),
i was told by my manager that most of it was unenforcable. why was i
signing it then? i think companies should be sued for crap like that.
here in ireland consumer groups are going after retailers who have signs
like "no cash refunds, this does not affect your statuatory rights."
that's intimidation - you have a right to a cash refund under irish/eu
law. and i didn't hear the whole program, but i got the idea that signs
like that are illegal.
likewise i'd really like to see contracts/nda's like many of those in
the tech industry chased down and brought in line with the law.
kevin
--
kevin at ie.suberic.net "I think we need to change the old saying
fork()'ed on 37058400 that we need a building to fall on us,
meatspace place: home because two did and we still don't get it."
http://ie.suberic.net/~kevin --Bill Maher in a Salon interview
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!