Based on my reading of GPL v2 and MPL v1.1, it seems to me that the only
significant difference between these two licenses is that MPL disallows
redistribution of source that has been modified to include GPL'd source.
Is anybody here sufficiently versed in both licenses to either agree
with my opinion on this or explain why I'm wrong?
Thanks,
Ruairi
--
Windows: An unrecoverable acquisition error.
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
