Quoting Wynne, Conor (conor_wynne at maxtor.com):
> OK, I have a question about virii and linux. [since its being discussed]
>> In a linux only LAN / HAN is there any NEED for a virusscanner?
No, with asterisks. ;->
It's easy to write Linux viruses. It's difficult to get Linux users to
execute them (especially as a privileged user). It's extremely
non-trivial to get them to spread that way, such that in practic it
The reasons are partly system and application design, and partly user
culture. The two are of course entwined.
Discussions of this topic tend to be marred by OS-advocacy and knee-jerk
views. After I got tired of such discussions, I wrote the four essays
beginning here: http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/#virus
I would maintain that virus-scanners are needed on Win32 and MacOS
_either_ -- in the vanishingly rare cases where users are willing to
assume responsibility for what code they choose to run. They're a
crutch for the willfully hapless.
Cheers, There are only 10 types of people in this world --
Rick Moen those who understand binary arithmetic and those who don't.
rick at linuxmafia.com
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!