[ILUG] bind + lex + yacc...

[Justin MacCarthy]

Never having to support a large network myself, I know very little about
this..
but what do lex & yacc have to do with anything ?

These are language parsers, used to build complilers / interptreters  and
the like???!!!

BIND, ok large networks might need DNS....

Have I missed something completely?

J

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ilug-admin at linux.ie [mailto:ilug-admin at linux.ie]On Behalf Of kevin
> lyda
> Sent: Monday, July 22, 2002 3:39 PM
> To: irish linux users group
> Subject: [ILUG] bind + lex + yacc...
>
>
> i recently received this email from a friend of mine in the states:
>
>     i'm trying to figure out how to maintain about 200 domains, with a
>     hundred or so computers per domain.  some internal, some external.
>     i recently learned lex and yacc and i'm thinking that's the way to go.
>     i don't really know perl and i know it's useful but i think i can
>     write c faster then perl.
>
>     is this a good idea?
>
>     ps  we're really busy.
>
> obviously as a stupid developer with no real admin experience to speak
> of, i'm not qualified to answer this question.  does anyone with real
> admin experience have any suggestions here?  the problem sounds really
> hard, and i doubt anyone has had to deal with this level of complexity
> so there probably aren't any existing tools written.
>
> anyone else have any opinions or experience i could pass on?
>
> kevin
>
> --
> kevin at suberic.net     that a believer is happier than a skeptic
> is no more to
> fork()'ed on 37058400    the point than the fact that a drunken
> man is happier
> meatspace place: home       than a sober one. the happiness of
> credulity is a
> http://ie.suberic.net/~kevin   cheap & dangerous quality -- g.b. shaw
>
> --
> Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug at linux.ie
> http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription
> information.
> List maintainer: listmaster at linux.ie
>
>
>