On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 07:25:38PM +0100, Paul Kelly <longword at esatclear.ie> wrote:
> > gave
> > me an error message.
> Ah if only life were so simple.
Yes I know. That's what I wrote down last lines that I solved a similar
situation with iproute but I tried to find another way. That doesn't mean
that I don't like iproute but I always try to find new ways. I knew that
facts but with iptables SNAT and DNAT fully supported in kernel space
and tried to use it.
> packet. So yes, your 213.163.36.158 packets will come in on eth0, but
> any reply will be treated no different from any other packet - thus it
> will be thrown back at your default gateway on ppp0.
Yes, that's why I tried to find a way with normal ifconfig+route+iptables
way.
>http://www.tldp.org/. It's not pretty, and good docs on iproute2 are
> very hard to find, but it does get the job done. You can instruct your
I solved a situation with 4 NICs when I had to use iproute2 to be able to
use advanced bandwith management. But why don't try it with another
way? So, I made my life not so simple.
thanks anyway,
Ago
ps.: I tried becaus I recalled that's possible under FreeBSD, but I'm not
sure
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
