[ILUG] Not following this.

[Anders Holm]

I'd be very interested in seeing this report and also in any way possible 
try to help out in any way possible.

This is a clear case of false marketing. As we all know, there is no better 
way to get caught in a .NET that you can't get out of then by choosing 
M$..... <pun intended>

If this would go to court, I'd be very interested in hearing the results of 
this bout and I'm assuming everyone else on this list would be
  as well....

--Anders--


At 10:42 07/03/02 +0000, Gavin Henrick wrote:
>Once the deal is finalised (close) I intend to write up a detailed (no 
>names) case study on this, and possibly look to the SME bodies, for 
>disseminating, or presenting it.
>
>Gavin.
>
>Breathnach, Proinnsias (Dublin) wrote:
>>Does anyone else think that in this case it might be fair to "Name and
>>Shame" the "computer company" involved ??
>>I'd rather they got some education than keep spreading that FUD around ...
>>Actually, I'd be interested in seeing / hearing the arguments used to (try
>>and) convince said SME, it could be used for an ILUG FAQ of some sort to be
>>distributed to businesses ...
>>P
>>-----8<----
>>
>>>Some "computer company" has tried to convince an SME i know that :
>>>
>>>The SME would not be able to integrate and maintain their website if 
>>>they go the Linux route! (for internal office server). The SME were told 
>>>they need to be on the .NET (Microsoft) system as any other way there 
>>>are too many complications.
>>-----8<----
>
>
>
>
>--
>Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug at linux.ie
>http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
>List maintainer: listmaster at linux.ie