On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 05:17:48PM +0000, Niall O Broin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 04:46:08PM +0000, John Tobin wrote:
> > Take a look in the sshd_config file on both machines for a line
> > reading "Protocol 2,1" or similar specifying which protocol to try
> > first. That might be the difference.
ugh, bad solution.
> That was the issue - different protocol specification on both boxes. Odd,
> because they should both have been as installed. As Kevin pointed out, the
> dsa and rsa keys would have helped too. Pro tem, being under pressure to
> make this work, I've gone with protocol ver. 1 as my answer. I'll have to
> have a read and see why I need to use ver. 2. For those in a similar
> position, sshd -d is quite useful but when you use it with ssh -v it gets
> even better :-) In fact if I'd used ssh -v first I probably wouldn't have
> needed sshd -d :-(
protocol 1 is less secure. i think there's a theoretical attack
against it. version 2 is better. just put you id_dsa.pub key into
~/.ssh/authorized_keys2. it's simple.
kevin at suberic.net buffy: come on, can't you put your foot down?!
fork()'ed on 37058400 giles: it *is* down.
meatspace place: orbit buffy: one of these days you're going to have to
http://suberic.net/~kevin get a grown up car. --inca mummy girl
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!