LINUX.IE, website of the Irish Linux Users' Group
Tux rules!

   
Home
New Users
Articles
Download
Projects
Community
Vendors

  Print Version
Email to...
 
Archives:


planetILUG

Recent News

News Archive


Join the
ILUG
on FaceBook


Join the
ILUG
on LinkedIn


Join the
ILUG SETI
Group



















 
 :: Mailing Lists

[ILUG] setting up a mail server

[ILUG] setting up a mail server

Rick Moen rick at linuxmafia.com
Fri May 10 04:10:23 IST 2002


Quoting Ciaran (cj at nologic.org):

> In Rick's initial mail he claimed I was attempting to con the original 
> poster. 

Oh dear.  I see no such post, here.

He seems, rather, to be making a reference to a private e-mail.  But I
didn't attribute such motives to anyone in private mail _either_.  
(I made a passing remark that I don't appreciate attempts to con people
about the nature of open source, but didn't say that was his intent.)

Airing private e-mail on mailing lists generally strikes me as a bad
idea for quite a lot of reasons.  And attempting to paraphrase actually
makes matters worse:  Suppose you accidentally misrepresent what someone
says?

Anyhow, I'm sure Ciaran is a fine fellow, and I certainly would not, and
do not, impugn his motives.

But I do wonder how he could imagine I was accusing him of conning
someone else when he was writing solely to _me_.  That doesn't seem to
make a whole lot of sense.

> What I *meant* is that it is proprietary for the reasons you cited,
> but open source in that the source is, well, for want of a better
> word, open.

We call that viewable-source or source-available software.  It's a
category of proprietary code.  (None of these terms is pejorative, just
descriptive of the licence categories.)

> If a piece of software provides the source code freely, allows
> modifications for personal use and patches for distribution but does
> not have an OSI sticker, does this mean that I cannot use the words
> "open" and "source" in that order in the same sentence as that product
> without fear of reprisals?

If by "reprisals" you mean people saying "Please don't call proprietary
software open source, because isn't", then I suppose so.  But that seems
more than a little melodramatic.

> Or is "Open Source" proprietary? 

To the same degree that the word "down" is proprietary because
people will consider someone bizarre who uses it to mean "up".

That rhetoric is _really_ reaching, methinks.

-- 
Cheers,                          "The only good goth is a shoggoth...."
Rick Moen                           -- Alistair J.R. Young, in r.a.sf.w.r-j
rick at linuxmafia.com




More information about the ILUG mailing list
Read this without the formatting.
                                                                                                    

 

Hosted by HEAnet


Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds, used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance of this highly praised website. Looking for the Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
RSS Version
Powered by Dell