[ILUG] non-GPL bits in RedHat 8?

[Stephane Dudzinski]

Well, AFAIK, Mandrake is quite the only COMMERCIAL distribution which
contains 100% pure GPL code.

Steph

On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 15:06, Waider wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> 
> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=41285&cid=4372974
> 
> suggests that there are parts of Red Hat that are not redistributable. I
> guess this means they're non-GPL. I'm amazed that the kneejerk reactions
> haven't already started; when I saw this item on slashdot (it's down in
> the 8.0 Release thread) I was amazed that there'd be no poorly-worded
> backlash posts about what a bunch of money-grubbing etc. Red Hat are and
> how this would be their downfall and...
> 
> er, sorry. got carried away there. Anyway. Since I haven't had a chance
> to look through the goodies, does anyone know which bits exactly are
> covered by this?
> 
> Cheers,
> Waider. Curious more than anything else.
> - --
> waider at waider.ie / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iQEVAwUBPZr9WqHbXyzZsAb3AQElSggAyxS5Kak2YUGCG8GLFh4BTcO58l1N53Aj
> fjOLLfAfVM2olRWfSmMl6ZaWxkdFimHDSR3TZpcKK44ZFSEiT6EnI9XhoM4OYjr3
> Cvpg/AozKE8j2uDQ65/4bXjwBHP5qynw1W2Huu/9HTn2u3dTgQCM9VSXx+tSK1Vf
> iizdUqR8xlfL/7DQ3TqFUjtMfFKiCci0ArJFj+xCC9j7MKW9eePc43tfGUtvO87K
> ZbSpkQVXlQ4z5SYpzN5i65yuSn5f69gU5ASAZsIm/4Zu9XlLuRxqaM31FkYTExoe
> zo3vthg8rr2XKGCgH7KbkV6r0PrDGA6D5qICqviPWzfD7enItvLcxg==
> =HAc7
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> -- 
> Irish Linux Users' Group: ilug at linux.ie
> http://www.linux.ie/mailman/listinfo/ilug for (un)subscription information.
> List maintainer: listmaster at linux.ie
-- 
______________________________________________
Stephane Dudzinski       Systems Administrator
NewWorldIQ            	     t: +353 1 4334357
www.newworldiq.com           f: +353 1 4334301