Well it looks like it doesn't work :--(
After much googling, it seems to be that it is supported -> as long as you
use doze!
So hows about doing round-robin DNS, I reckon I'll go for that instead.
Later
CW
-------------------------------------
> Can anyone see a problem with intels e1000 and switch fault tolerance?
>> Can I setup SFT with two network switches with one e1000 connected to one
> and the other to, well the other switch?
> I am running around looking for a second gigaswitch at the moment [bloody
> bank-holidays] but I heard a rumour that its not supported in this config?
> [but that it works in doze]
> AFT [adaptive fault tolerance] is supported but with both nics connected
> to one switch, but when the switch goes down, well I ain't got no more
> tolerance
>> What I was thinking was :--
>> 1. setup AFT, i.e.: two NICS without an ipaddress and a virtual nic with
> the ip.
> 2. Instead of connecting to one switch, simply have each physical nic
> connect to one switch each, and have a switch-switch connection going on.
>> I don't see why that wouldn't work.
> Off to do some googling now.
>> CW
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
