> Ok i did write all that crap below which is a bit of a rant
>> But I'm gonna condense it somewhat.
>> Mozilla performance was shit.
> Thunderbird and Firefox are fast.
> Thunderbird and Firefox popularity is growing faster than Mozilla.
> Speed is extremely important.
> Opensource projects have a habit of sticking their heads in the sand and
> denying speed problems.
Certainly one of the more informative rants, I've come across in my
mailing list experience. You make a persuasive case. As a user of old
hardware, speed is definitely an important issue for me. I must do a few
speed comparisons - and download the latest Openoffice. I'm very
interested to find out how much faster it runs. Anyone know of a good
way of benchmarking loading time for browsers aside from one's own
(subjective) sense of speed? Though, I have to admit that the important
factor for me is how fast the content I'm interested in becomes readable
- something which also depends on the design of the site.
Just looking now, I see that the Mozilla development team seem to be
addressing the performance issue. From
"Compared to Mozilla 1.6, 1.7b is 7% faster to start up, 8% faster to
open new windows and 9% faster to load pages. And it does all this while
being 5% smaller."
Cheers for the feedback,
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!