On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Rick Moen wrote:
> Wow. We _really_ don't have common ground for discussion.
Probably.
> Well, no. The main point is the thinner cables, with a small
> additional gain from reduced power consumption (resulting
> indirectly from the much lower voltage). So, tinier, cooler drives
> in tinier boxes.
Right. That'd be what SATA 1.0a brings to the table.
> Otherwise, there's not much substantive improvement.
Not in SATA 1.0a, no, that intentionally specified physical layer
only, simply carrying ATA and ATAPI commands. But SATA 1.1 (aka SATA
II) adds command queueing, SAF-TE, signal recovery / hot-swap (device
quiescence, comms state (stop/start/reset - whole state machine)),
async notification, etc.
The host controller interfaces tend to be far far nicer and more
modern too, from what i gather from Jeff Garzik's posts.
> Suckers have money, too. ;->
true.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul at clubi.iepaul at jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to spam at dishone.st
Fortune:
The better part of valor is discretion.
-- William Shakespeare, "Henry IV"
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
