On Thu, 2004-12-02 at 11:02 +0000, Paul Jakma wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Dec 2004, Liam Bedford wrote:
>> > It was from my memory that the XP2 firewall drops ICMP by default.
> > Could be wrong.. my memory isn't as good as paul's ;)
>> That report wasnt terribly detailed, but is it not possible they
> recorded fewer attacks because the firewall had blocked the relevant
> ports than that it was because ICMP was blocked?
>the windows firewall I've used most (zone alarm) classes any attempt to
do anything as an attack. It depends on what the "attack" is defined as.
> Cause I dont see tonnes of ICMP probes here, but I do see tonnes of
> cruddage directed at various udp and tcp ports (which suggests
> blocking ICMP makes 0 difference..)
>Maybe worms don't like you?
L.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.linux.ie/pipermail/ilug/attachments/20041202/06309851/attachment.pgp
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
