LINUX.IE, website of the Irish Linux Users' Group
Tux rules!

   
Home
New Users
Articles
Download
Projects
Community
Vendors

  Print Version
Email to...
 
Archives:


planetILUG

Recent News

News Archive


Join the
ILUG
on FaceBook


Join the
ILUG
on LinkedIn


Join the
ILUG SETI
Group



















 
 :: Mailing Lists

[ILUG] Porting MyDoom to Linux

[ILUG] Porting MyDoom to Linux

Paul Jakma paul at clubi.ie
Tue Feb 3 20:56:04 GMT 2004


On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, kevin lyda wrote:

> several people - paulj and chriss higgens have pointed out the
> technology of why it's easy.  i'll point out the social reasons why
> it is not.  the social reason is that there is no standard "linux"
> and there is no standard mua on linux.  and most distros are
> setting up a linux world w/o a standard mta too.

Hey, I pointed those reasons out too! diversity and a more technical
userbase, i said, were the main obstacles to worms on linux/unix! no
fair.. /me sulks.

The userbase argument though is specious, for if Linux ever were to 
gain dominance it would also gain all those users who just want to be 
able to click on the apparent cool screensaver. ("whats that i 
wonder?"), and even if current Unix MUAs tend not to make it that 
easy, if linux were dominent surely someone would write an MUA which 
did. :)

> the problem for virus/worm viruses is that it is quite likely that
> there will be a unique answer for each of us -
> linux-2.4.18:mutt-1.2.5.1-1:gnupg-1.0.6-5:netpbm-9.24-3:lots more.  
> and in the case of folks using certain mail clients (mutt, mh,
> others?) the configs will wildly affect what tools are used to
> parse mime.

Unfortunately though, Linux is not quite diverse enough. The apache 
mod_ssl worms were able to target specific linux distro's (ie RH7.3 
iirc) and be confident of infecting a significant degree of Linux 
apache installs. Exec-shield in FC1 and (i think) later RH9 kernels 
mitigates that though.

> so yes, technically linux shares some of the same potential faults.
> however i can think of only two times unix/linux had a worm spread
> rampently from system to system - the morris worm in 1988 on
> bsd/vax systems and a few years back on linux/apache/x86 systems
> (code red i think?).

Hmm.. no, was something else.

However, is the lack of worms by virtue of the security of Unix or
simply because Unix is far less conspicious than WinXX + LookOut? I'd 
argue the latter case.

>  neither of those exploited any mua.

> kevin

regards,
-- 
Paul Jakma	paul at clubi.ie	paul at jakma.org	Key ID: 64A2FF6A
	warning: do not ever send email to spam at dishone.st
Fortune:
Divorce is a game played by lawyers.
		-- Cary Grant



More information about the ILUG mailing list
Read this without the formatting.
                                                                                                    

 

Hosted by HEAnet


Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds, used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance of this highly praised website. Looking for the Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
RSS Version
Powered by Dell