> -----Forwarded Message-----
> From: Brian McGroarty <brian at hisnetwork.nospam>
> Subject: [linux-elitists] Microsoft goes after Linux kernel downloaders?
> Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:15:28 -0600
>> I went trolling, and it seems I caught the biggest fish of them all.
>>> When the story about the MS leak appeared on Slashdot this past week,
> I thought I'd have a bit of fun. A post entitled "Kernel source here,"
> which pointed to a torrent of Linux 2.6.2, was all it took to hook
> about a thousand would-be NT and 2000 source downloaders.
>>> "You can find the build applications and such with Google already."
>>> I trickled the torrent out at about 1k/s for the first few hours, then
> let it go full-speed once we'd crossed over 600 active
> participants. Let 'em all have the punchline at once.
>> Imagine my surprise when my DSL stops working this morning, I call my
> provider, and I learn that I've been accused of copyright
> infringement. I argued that I was doing absolutely nothing wrong, and
> they turned service back on. After I asked to see the accuser's email,
> they forwarded the below. Sure enough, it's a bona fide valentine from
> MS Legal:
>>> J.K. Weston
> Microsoft Corporation
> One Microsoft Way
> Redmond, WA 98052
>jkweston at microsoft.com> Tel: (425) 703-5529
>> 14 Feb 2004
>> URGENT/IMMEDIATE ATTENTION REQUIRED
> VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL
>> [My ISP]
>> Re: NOTICE OF POTENTIAL UNLAWFUL DISTRIBUTION OF MICROSOFT SOURCE
> CODE AT: [one of my IPs]
>> Date of Infringement: Detail below.
>> Dear [My ISP]:
>> We have received information that one of your users as identified
> above by the SITE/URL [My IP] may have engaged in the unlawful
> distribution of Microsoft's source code for Windows 2000, and/or
> Windows NT4, by distributing and offering for download these source
> code files via a peer-to-peer network.
>> Since you own this IP address, we request that you take appropriate
> action against the account holder under your Abuse Policy/Terms of
> Service Agreement.
>>> The IP they chose wasn't the tracker, it was a system participating as
> a torrent peer. This makes me wonder if there are a thousand other
> P2P Linux 2.6.2 downloaders enjoying MS' Feb 14 love.
>>> Now, admittedly I was just asking for it by hinting at something that
> might offend the big giant. Still, it took them three or four days to
> issue this letter. In the meantime, shouldn't they have been able to
> find someone capable of cracking open a .tar.bz2? Did nobody raise the
> question of how a leaked CD fits into a 32m file?
> _______________________________________________
> linux-elitists
>http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-elitists>>>
==============================================================================
If you are not an intended recipient of this e-mail, please notify
the sender, delete it and do not read, act upon, print, disclose,
copy, retain or redistribute it.
Click here for important additional terms relating to this e-mail.
<http://www.ml.com/email_terms/>
==============================================================================
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!