On Wed, Jan 21, 2004 at 10:01:48AM +0000, P at draigBrady.com wrote:
> very cool.
> Something related is a simple patch I did to bash to
> seperate the interactive stuff (prompt etc.) from stderr,
> allowing you to process the stderr specially.
>http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-bash/2001-08/msg00040.html> I guess this would allow you to `sexec bash` ?
Well right now you can use sexec bash -i, but yes - it's ugly,
it does seem crazy that it uses stderr for it's own prompts.
Using /dev/tty would definitely be useful for keeping track
with sexec, *goes to build a new version of bash*.
Colm MacCárthaigh Public Key: colm+pgp at stdlib.net
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!