On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 12:19:57PM +0100, Steven Satelle (Service Desk) wrote:
> But I truely
> felt at the time that the direction linux was moving in was away from its
> 'open' history and towards a more 'closed' one (not moving away from the gpl
> which it cant). just more of a model of, you can get the source but you have
> to pay me first.
That's *exactly* the point ! ... there is no requirement or
obligation on me to provide you with source code for a GPL application
I've written unless I supply you with the binary. In turn, I can charge
whatever I like for the binary (the charge for the source must be
minimal if existant).
Does it make any more sense now ?
> Either way, I was wrong, I just saw a couple of small items and made a major
> deduction from it.
Nah ... just misguided !
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.linux.ie/pipermail/ilug/attachments/20040707/c8a1474b/attachment.pgp
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!