On Tue, 13 Jul 2004, John P. Looney wrote:
> No, if you raid 1 before you raid 0, you can lose half you disks,
well, 1 over 0 or 0 over 1 - makes no difference to reliability
really. But I have had 4 disks, I'd go for RAID-5 on 3 + hot spare.
> and keep going (though they have to be the right half!).
> It's the configuration Sun recommend in all installations to people
> that have loads of money; RAID1+0 and a hot spare (or two).
Hmm, the E2xx cluster at alphyra was installed by sun with mirrored
> I'd only recommend it in cases where there are a lot of writes -
> like mail and database servers. It'll beat RAID5 by a good margin.
i'd much prefer raid-5 + spare, or mirrored raid-5 :)
> I'll be building a new mail server soon, with 6 15kRPM SCSI disks
> in it; I'll have a go with bonnie, and see what we get for RAID1+0
> and RAID5.
Be interesting. Try the new RAID-6 too, just for kicks.
Paul Jakma paul at clubi.iepaul at jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to spam at dishone.st
There is no likelihood man can ever tap the power of the atom.
-- Robert Millikan, Nobel Prize in Physics, 1923
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!