LINUX.IE, website of the Irish Linux Users' Group
Tux rules!

   
Home
New Users
Articles
Download
Projects
Community
Vendors

  Print Version
 
Archives:


planetILUG

Recent News

News Archive


Join the
ILUG
on FaceBook


Join the
ILUG
on LinkedIn


Join the
ILUG SETI
Group



















 
 :: Mailing Lists

[ILUG] Spam and more spam

[ILUG] Spam and more spam

Justin Mason jm at jmason.org
Wed Mar 3 00:47:49 GMT 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Rick Moen writes:
>Quoting Colm Buckley (colm at tuatha.org):
>
>> Unless I can eliminate the spam and virus mail before it hits mailman, 
>> this isn't really an option....
>
>And that _is_ of course the key to the matter.  Thus my prior post,
>which primarily concerned the gain from SMTP-time callbacks and other
>MTA-level intelligent detection and handling.
>
>In addition to my own mailhost's lists, I'm also listadmin for a bunch
>of mailing lists concerning Linux Gazette (the real one, that lives at
>http://linuxgazette.net/) -- and regret frequently having agreed to do
>that, because the MTA admin does _not_ do SMTP-time filtering, resulting
>in that same barrage of junkmail in the mod queue you mention.  (At my
>insistence, all those lists are configured for subscriber-only posting,
>resulting in me rather than the membership being plagued by junkmail.)
>
>I've considered withdrawing my offer to admin those lists until the
>machine owner implements smarter MTA behaviour, but will probably endure
>the hassle for a while longer.
>
>
>Re-implementing Marc Merlin's work inside the Postfix framework sounds
>like a job that's (1) very worthwhile, but also (2) a lot of work, and
>therefore (3) a-priori unlikely to occur.  I'd be delighted to be proved
>wrong about that, as I have enormous respect for that MTA.
>
>My pessimistic prediction, then (based on long acquaintance with the
>quirks of sysadmin psychology -- not least my own) is that a decision
>that Marc's ideas should be re-implemented in Postfix instead of using
>Exim4 equates to deciding against the idea, merely on the installment
>plan rather than right away.

Marc's work *is* nifty, he's done a good job of integration there.
But there are alternative ways to implement SpamAssassin with
Postfix at the MTA level.

The easy way is to define a simple transport to filter all mail
through SpamAssassin:
http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/IntegratedInMta

The more complex, but in this case more useful and sa-exim-ish way:
http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/IntegratedInPostfixWithAmavis
(I'd skip Razor though.)

BTW another possibility -- write a simple script that catches
list posts on the list addrs, filters through spamc, and sidelines
the spam.   That would be pretty easy ;)

You'd need to use a high threshold though, to avoid FPs -- and
probably write a rule or two, or train a bayes db, to catch
the viruses.

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFARSs0QTcbUG5Y7woRAlhHAJ9PIGIXUb03vIdNiv436W+b/WNJaQCgoRDe
Wj2V1CXBXKwynN4OLUb7q1Q=
=lQmW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




More information about the ILUG mailing list
Read this without the formatting.
                                                                                                    

 

Hosted by HEAnet


Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds, used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance of this highly praised website. Looking for the Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!
RSS Version
Powered by Dell