Is this a monopolistic practise or not?
(As I write this mail I sit here with a very cheesy grin, enough to make
the cat in Alice in wonderland be jealous.)
Just so you can see what spurred my thoughts:
Some companies when installing their operating systems on a shared
partition have it over write the master boot record (aka the MBR).
This action destroying the dual boot capability of that partition and so
the machine needs more management to restore this function could this be
construed as a practise designed to stifle competition.
If it is and this is a big it could such a company be billed for the
hours of work that this design choice causes?
If it is not then it would be great to see these companies innovate in
They could of course use LILO or GRUB or even adapt the FreeBSD boot
loader if they do not like the licences of the previous two.
Just my three cents worth.
Have a great week,
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!