On Mon, 3 May 2004, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> So I would suggest that the term "open standards" needs to be defined.
> It is perfectly reasonable to ask Ms Hanafin what she understands by this term
> since she has said government policy will rely on it.
>> Sadly, I haven't seen anything on the ILUG mailing list so far
> that I would consider likely to change the government's mind.
> May I suggest that ILUG should take a leaf out of ICTE's success.
> Margaret McGaley, Colm MacCarthaigh et al
> were endlessly courteous, never insulting ministers
> or suggesting that they had secret agendas.
>> Also ICTE had one simple message - VVAT -
> backed by rational argument.
>> In my opinion, open standards - strictly adhered to -
> will allow Linux to compete on a level field.
If I can offer my 2c, Tim has hit the nail on the head here. A simple
point, driven home well, can have a far greater effect. Also, by aiming
for 'open standards' (by this I mean, they're fully disclosed,
non-patented, and free, as in beer, to whoever needs to know them) one can
avoid the charge of being 'anti-microsoft'.
Also, basing your position as being against microsoft is a very negative
Maintained by the ILUG website team. The aim of Linux.ie is to
support and help commercial and private users of Linux in Ireland. You can
display ILUG news in your own webpages, read backend
information to find out how. Networking services kindly provided by HEAnet, server kindly donated by
Dell. Linux is a trademark of Linus Torvalds,
used with permission. No penguins were harmed in the production or maintenance
of this highly praised website. Looking for the
Indian Linux Users' Group? Try here. If you've read all this and aren't a lawyer: you should be!